According to Google, email and instant messaging were both designed in the 1960s, yet haven’t changed much in the last forty years or so.
Until Google Wave.
“Here’s how it works: In Google Wave you create a wave and add people to it. Everyone on your wave can use richly formatted text, photos, gadgets, and even feeds from other sources on the web. They can insert a reply or edit the wave directly. It’s concurrent rich-text editing, where you see on your screen nearly instantly what your fellow collaborators are typing in your wave. That means Google Wave is just as well suited for quick messages as for persistent content — it allows for both collaboration and communication. You can also use “playback” to rewind the wave and see how it evolved.”
The website details their plans for the product, platform and protocol, and then asks the following question:
“So, this leaves one big question we need your help answering: What else can we do with this?”
So to recap: Here’s our plan. This is the tool. Any idea how we can use it?
There’s a YouTube video that explains the concept, but it’s 90% hype and 10% waffle. But if I filter through the sludge (a good example being when one of the speakers describes how email works), I think I get what the product is, and what it does.
But I still don’t get why we would use it.
We already have email, Instant Messaging, bulletin boards, wikis, voicemail, Twitter, blogs, video/voice conferencing and more. Do we really need another platform?
Are Google fixing something that isn’t broken? Or are they building a nice idea that’ll never really catch on?
If you get to 10 minutes 45 or so of the video, you’ll start wondering why they don’t use the phone, text messaging or video conferencing.
Am I missing something here? Or am I just too old to “get it”?


No, you’re not too old to get it. Or at least I hope. I’m still a fair way away from 30 (as a point of illustration) and I still don’t get why we’d use it.
I haven’t seen the video yet, but from what I have read so far, they want to mix up all different communication media. What they forgot is:
-when I watch a movie I don’t listen to what you say.
-when I read a book, I’m ignoring the radio
-when I’m busy listening to music, I probably don’t realize where I’m walking
We can’t function on multiple input. It might look snazzy, but to communicate efficiently we need to separate out the inputs into meaningful, coherent interactions.
FaceBook tried mixing their inputs into one big output (combingin the wall, the feed and the apps notifications) and that was just butt ugly.
Google Wave is Chat Room 2.0
But for meaningful communication – I think we’re still fine where we are. And for the record: the Romans, too, used keys and locks. It has persisted because it’s adapted for the task. Same goes for email and message boards.
Good, I just don’t know what to hope for…or fear… If it turns out to be chat room 2.0, I’m going back to blackboard and chalk =P
What I WOULD like from Google is the possibility to be logged on to my private Gmail and Blogger, at the same time as I’m logged on to my AdWords Professionals account…. Seems like it’s a though one